State v. Stimpson, 563 A.2d 1001 (Vt. 1989)

Cases | State v. Stimpson, 563 A.2d 1001 | 2018

The defendant pled nolo contendere to several burglary offenses and was ordered to pay restitution as a condition of probation. The defendant appealed from a portion of the award that corresponded to a burglary incident that was not covered by the plea agreement and for which the defendant was not convicted. The court reversed and remanded for reduction of the award by the amount of damages allocated to the burglary offense, and for entry of a new order.
distinguished by State v. VanDusen, 166 Vt. 240, 691 A.2d 1053 (Vt. 1997) (distinguishing the case from State v. Knapp, 147 Vt. 56, 509 A.2d 1010 (Vt. 1986) and State v. Stimpson, 151 Vt. 645, 563 A.2d 1001 (Vt. 1989) on the ground that the restitution award related directly to the conduct for which the the defendant was convicted)