Search Results

| 1411 - 1420 of 35515

  • Eichelberger v. State, 916 S.W.2d 109 (Ark. 1996)

    Cases | Eichelberger v. State, 916 S.W.2d 109 (Ark. 1996)

    The defendants were adjudged to be delinquents, and were ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $9,956.47 to one of the victims, and less than $2,000 to the other victims. The defendants appealed, arguing that the application of restitution statutes that were enacted after the defendants...

  • Donovan v. State, 32 S.W.3d 1 (Ark. Ct. App. 2000)

    Cases | Donovan v. State, 32 S.W.3d 1 (Ark. Ct. App. 2000)

    The defendant was found guilty of theft by deception and sentenced to, among other things, pay restitution to the victim in the amount of $60,000. The defendant appealed, arguing, among other things, that the trial court erred in ordering restitution when it failed to give him credit for sums...

  • Copeland v. State, 37 S.W.3d 567 (Ark. 2001)

    Cases | Copeland v. State, 37 S.W.3d 567 (Ark. 2001)

    The defendant was convicted of first-degree murder. He appealed, arguing, among other things, that the trial court erred in permitting the victim’s former wife to read her statement to the jury during the sentencing phase. The Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed, noting first that it was not...

  • Clampet v. State, 99 S.W.3d 414 (Ark. 2003)

    Cases | Clampet v. State, 99 S.W.3d 414 (Ark. 2003)

    The defendant pled guilty to the charge of first-degree criminal mischief. Among other things, he was ordered to pay $500.00 “restitution in lieu of a fine,” and $1,124.10 in victim restitution. Thereafter, the defendant was twice found to be in violation of his probation. At the first...

  • Brimer v. State, 785 S.W.2d 458 (Ark. 1990)

    Cases | Brimer v. State, 785 S.W.2d 458 (Ark. 1990)

    The defendant pled guilty to theft of property in connection with her misappropriation of approximately $100,000 from her employer. The trial court ordered, among other things, that she pay restitution in the amount of $135,000 at the rate of $200.00 per month for twelve years, at which time a...

  • Beqiri v. State, 224 S.W.3d 575 (Ark. Ct. App. 2006)

    Cases | Beqiri v. State, 224 S.W.3d 575 (Ark. Ct. App. 2006)

    The defendant was convicted of passing a hot check in an amount greater than $2,500 and ordered, among other things, to make restitution. The defendant appealed, arguing that the trial judge erred in failing to require the State to prove in a restitution hearing the amount of restitution that he...

  • Bailey v. State, 74 S.W.3d 622 (Ark. 2002)

    Cases | Bailey v. State, 74 S.W.3d 622 (Ark. 2002)

    The defendant, a minor, pled guilty to residential burglary and theft of property. He was placed on probation and ordered to pay restitution in an amount to be determined within ninety days from the date of the adjudication hearing. No subsequent order by the trial court set restitution at a fixed...

  • Anderson v. State, 242 S.W.3d 229 (Ark. 2006)

    Cases | Anderson v. State, 242 S.W.3d 229 (Ark. 2006)

    The defendant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. He appealed his conviction and sentence. The conviction was affirmed, but the sentence of death was reversed and remanded. He then appealed his sentence of death entered on remand, arguing, among other things, that the circuit...

  • § 42-924.03. Protection order granted to respondent; when

    Statutes | Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-924.03

    A court shall only grant a respondent a protection order if (1) the respondent files a cross or counter petition seeking a protection order and (2) the issuing court makes specific findings of domestic or family abuse against the respondent and determines that the respondent is entitled to a...

  • State in re J.G, 701 A.2d 1260 (N.J. 1997)

    Cases | State Ex Rel. J.G., 701 A.2d 1260 (N.J. 1997)

    The defendants were charged with juvenile delinquency for acts constituting the equivalent of aggravated sexual assault. Following the filing of the charges, the State ordered the juveniles to submit to AIDS and HIV testing. The defendants opposed the testing as an unconstitutional search. The...